When a film earns distribution revenue, the money is paid out in a set order called a waterfall.
The waterfall, in four steps
- The costs of distribution come out first, including the exhibitor share on a theatrical release and any approved distributor and marketing expenses.
- Revenue that reaches the film then pays investors back their principal plus a premium, to 120% of what they put in, divided pro rata by share.
- Once investors have recouped in full, remaining money splits into two pools, typically 50% to the investor pool and 50% to the producer pool.
- A third-party CPA tracks each payout against the waterfall defined in the project's offering documents.
Austin Spicer teaches this structure in Week 6 of the American Film Association's 6 Week Accelerator. This article walks through it step by step, as education. The terms that govern any real project live in that project's own offering documents.
What a waterfall is
A waterfall is the order of payment, written down in advance. Money comes in at the top, each position gets paid according to the rules, and whatever is left flows down to the next position. If the money runs out partway down, everyone below that point receives nothing.
That's why investors ask about the waterfall before almost anything else. Underneath every other question is this one: where do I sit, and who gets paid before me?
Austin teaches the waterfall through a single sentence he asks every Accelerator student to learn by heart:
Our investors recoup from distribution revenue before producer back-end in a defined waterfall on an 18-24 month timeline, per the offering documents.
Every part of that sentence carries weight. Investors recoup before producer back-end. The order is defined in writing. There's a timeline. And the whole structure points back to the offering documents, because that's where the binding terms live.
First out: the costs of distribution
The first dollars a film earns never reach the film. In a theatrical release, theaters keep their share off the top, and Austin teaches that 50% usually goes to theaters automatically, before anyone connected to the film recoups anything. If a marketing partner put up money for prints, advertising, and digital costs, that partner recoups its money and approved expenses next. A distributor may also have expenses that come out at this stage.
His practical warning on this layer is about approval. Distributor and marketing expenses should be spelled out and pre-approved in an expense report before release, and a distributor can't take an expense that wasn't pre-approved. Filmmakers who skip that step can watch the top of the waterfall grow while they wait, so this layer deserves as much attention in the paperwork as the profit split at the bottom.
Next: investors recoup to 120%
Once revenue reaches the film, it goes to the investors. In the structure Austin teaches, investors sit in first position ahead of any producer back-end, and they stay there until they've received their principal plus a premium. In his words, "we're gonna give you 120% of your money back."
Recoupment to 120% means the investor is made whole and then paid an additional 20% on top of the original investment before the next stage opens.
His classroom illustration uses one investor and a $1,000,000 budget. At 120%, that investor receives $1,200,000, and only money that arrives after that point moves down to the profit pools. If distribution revenue stops before the 120% line, the pools below never open. The order is the investor's protection, and it pays only out of revenue that actually comes in.
How pro rata shares work
A film usually has more than one investor, so the recoupment layer is divided into pro rata shares. Each investor's share of every payout matches their share of the money raised.
Austin's example splits a $1,000,000 raise into 20 shares: "That's $50,000 per share." An investor who puts in $50,000 holds one share. An investor who puts in $100,000 holds two shares and receives twice the payout of a one-share investor at every step.
Pro rata math keeps the structure honest. Nobody negotiates a better position in a side conversation, and nobody has to trust the producer's arithmetic, because the same percentage applies to every dollar in the recoupment layer.
After recoupment: the two pools
Once investors have recouped in full to 120%, the waterfall changes shape. As Austin puts it, "everything after 120% is going to be 50-50."
Half goes to the investor pool, divided pro rata, so investors keep participating in the film's success. The other half goes to the producer pool.
The producer pool covers more people than the name suggests. It includes the producers and any above-the-line participants who negotiated back-end points, such as writers, directors, and actors. Those points are paid from this pool at this stage, which is what the memorized sentence means by producer back-end coming after investor recoupment.
The 50/50 split is the standard version Austin teaches, and other versions exist. A split can be set at 60/40, for example, or can change once a defined return threshold is reached. He advises working out those variations with an attorney or CPA, because a small change at this layer changes what every other position receives.
Who keeps the books
A waterfall only works if someone neutral runs the numbers. In Austin's teaching, a third-party accountant or CPA tracks the payouts. That may be the same firm that handles production payroll, paid a fee for the work. The arrangement matters for trust, because investors never have to take the producer's word for what came in and what went out.
The fall cohort heard the same point in institutional terms: "It's been created by our attorney that our CPA will handle." The attorney writes the defined waterfall into the offering documents, and the CPA applies it to real revenue as payouts come in.
That division of labor is part of what Austin means by professional structure, one of five criteria he teaches that investors apply in every meeting: risk mitigation, recoupment priority, exit potential, transparency, and professional structure.
The timeline and the documents that control
The 18 to 24 month timeline in the memorized sentence is a projected window for distribution revenue to move through the waterfall, based on the project's distribution timeline. It's a projection with no promise attached. Austin teaches students to build a true timeline for their own project instead of borrowing his numbers, and a less experienced team should state a longer window it can support over a tighter one it can't.
Two boundaries close the lesson. This article describes the structure Austin teaches for educational purposes. It doesn't describe the terms of any specific film or fund, and it makes no promise about returns on any project. A project's offering documents are the only place its actual waterfall, percentages, and timeline are set.
The American Film Association teaches this material. AFA doesn't finance films or provide capital. Week 6 exists to teach one skill: describing your waterfall clearly, in one sentence, before an investor has to ask.
Frequently asked questions
Who gets paid first from a film's revenue?
The waterfall order in the contracts governs: distributors recoup first, then lenders and investors, then profit participants, in the deal's order.
How do film investors get paid back?
Investors recoup their principal plus a premium, to 120% of what they put in, divided pro rata by share, before any split begins.
What is recoupment priority in a film deal?
The contractual rank that decides who is repaid before whom, and at what threshold the split of further revenue begins.